Posts Tagged ‘TED’

h1

Pondering Paraskevidekatriaphobia (and Tim Tebow) on Friday the 13th

January 13, 2012

What’s your (un)lucky number?

Yesterday, while volunteering during my younger son Max’s visit to his school’s library, we found and read through a Boston Celtics book together.

On the cover of the book was a picture of  the Celtics playing the Chicago Bulls. When Max, who loves basketball and is playing in a youth league, saw the picture, he exclaimed “that’s my team!”

He then added that he wears jersey number 13 (presently worn by Joakim Noah), to which I joked “unlucky 13?!”

Being a week shy of 6, Max looked at me and said “what does that mean?”

I then realized that  our cultural dislike (in some cases fear) of the number 13 – triskaidekaphobia in Greek – is not innate, but is learned.

But why does our culture dislike the number 13?

Being that today is “Friday the 13th” — another common folklore-inspired fear (paraskevidekatriaphobia in Greek) — I wanted to briefly explore some of the origins for these irrational ideas. Below are some snippets of insights I collected:

According to the USA Today article, “Three Friday the 13ths, 13 weeks apart, a rarity“:

“The number 13 and Friday are recurring presences in mythological, spiritual and religious tradition. In Christianity, 13 people attended the Last Supper before Judas’ betrayal and Jesus’ death on a Friday. A Norse myth warns of dire consequences for dining in groups of 13. Friday the 13th was the date the medieval Knights Templar were imprisoned.”

Interesting, the same USA Today article adds, “for many pagans, 13 is a lucky number, because it corresponds with the number of full moons each year.”

An About.com article, “Why Friday the 13th Is Unlucky,” offers these unique insights:

“…the number 13 may have been purposely vilified by the founders of patriarchal religions in the early days of western civilization because it represented femininity. Thirteen had been revered in prehistoric goddess-worshiping cultures, we are told, because it corresponded to the number of lunar (menstrual) cycles in a year (13 x 28 = 364 days).”

“Twelve gods were invited to a banquet at Valhalla. Loki, the Evil One, god of mischief, had been left off the guest list but crashed the party, bringing the total number of attendees to 13. True to character, Loki raised hell by inciting Hod, the blind god of winter, to attack Balder the Good, who was a favorite of the gods. Hod took a spear of mistletoe offered by Loki and obediently hurled it at Balder, killing him instantly. All Valhalla grieved.”

“As if to prove the point, the Bible tells us there were exactly 13 present at the Last Supper. One of the dinner guests — er, disciples — betrayed Jesus Christ, setting the stage for the Crucifixion.”

Michael Shermer  – Founding Publisher of Skeptic magazine, Executive Director of the Skeptics Society, and columnist for Scientific American — examines the reasons ”why people believe strange things” in his February 2006 TED Talk (presented below).

You can also watch it on the TED website and follow along with an interactive transcript).

In his speech he addresses questions such as “Why do people see the Virgin Mary on cheese sandwiches” or “Why do people hear demonic lyrics in ‘Stairway to Heaven’?”

It is for many of the reasons above that people look for logic — or at least deeper meaning — in places where there might really be none.

Consider the many other fears explained in the ABC News article, “Fear of Friday, the 13th (Paraskevidekatriaphobia) and Other Unpronounceable Phobias.”

Often people invent explanations for things they don’t understand (or don’t want to confront). Just think about how the world functioned before the emergence of science!

For example, the current irrational obsession with all of the instances of “316″ that presumably occurred when Tim Tebow lead the Denver Broncos to a playoff victory over the Pittsburgh Steelers last weekend.

When it comes to Tim Tebow, many well-meaning and honestly inspired individuals nevertheless connect dots that don’t necessarily make sense connecting and draw conclusions that are entirely based on assumptions and anecdotal evidence.

“Tebowmania” seemed to hit a crescendo following the hysteria when what appeared to be a “halo” formed over Mile High Stadium in Denver last Sunday after the team’s playoff win.

Interesting, whereas many jumped to conclusions that it was some kind of heavenly sign, one rationally minded reader of the article (who uses the name “Rotten Rodriguez”) explained it as follows:

“It wasn’t a halo. I was at the game. After Denver scores pyrotechni­cs are shot out of a cylinder in the south end zone. A smoke ring came off the cylinder then floated over the stadium for as long as it take a smoke ring to dissipate.”

Superstitions and strange rituals have been a part of sports since people began hitting balls with sticks.  For a good laugh read the ESPN article “Curses, superstitions and sports,” the Business Insider feature “The 30 Strangest Superstitions In Sports History,” and About.com’s piece “Why Do So Many Athletes, Have Superstitions and Rituals.”

If you’re feeling academically minded, read the scholarly paper titled “An Exploratory Investigation of Superstition, Personal Control, Optimism and Pessimism in NCAA Division I Intercollegiate Student Athletes.

If only Tim Tebow wore the number 13 instead of the number 15, perhaps he could have provided some additional inspiration for those who suffer from paraskevidekatriaphobia. Is Dan Marino is available?

That would be especially helpful this year since, as the USA Today article also points out, ”for the first time since 1984, those three Friday the 13ths — Jan. 13, April 13 and July 13 — are exactly 13 weeks apart.”

So, if you do suffer from paraskevidekatriaphobia, maybe you should start Tebowing – or consider the luck-related insights of Guy Kawasaki to whom I attributed the phrase “go luck yourself!”

PS: Despite the above exploration into the absurdity of superstition, I fully intend to wear my “lucky” Wes Welker jersey when my favorite NFL team, the New England Patriots, host the Denver Broncos for the Divisional AFC game on Saturday, January 14, 2012! ;-)

Photo Credit: “Friday the 13th” by Dennis Skley.

h1

Declare Your Independence from Indifference and Pursue Your Passion

July 4, 2011

Today, as Americans celebrate the 235th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence’s ratification by the Continental Congress, many of us repeat one of the more famous passages from that important document:

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

Thinking about those words for a moment I find myself wondering how many of us truly pursue that which makes us happy? How many of us have a longing for something greater that we have not yet pursued?

But would we actually pursue our dreams if all of those obstacles we claim impede us were removed from our path? Or, do we actually limit ourselves with our own fears and excuses? Does our own indifference ultimately derail us? Are we really the reasons behind our own failure to live our life’s purpose?

Like the character Neo in The Matrix, there have been times when we sense something is not right, but we knowingly choose the blue pill because we fear the reality of the red pill. Fortunately for Neo, he had the fortitude to embrace the unknown.

In his inspiring TED talk (provided below), Tony Robbins argues that we do just that and, despite tremendous obstacles we all possess the power to realize our dreams. Robbins explains that we fail to achieve our dreams not because we lack resources, but because we lack resourcefulness – the emotional ingenuity to achieve our dreams:

Despite it’s many flaws — and, believe me, I am the first to point them out vociferously –  no other nation offers so much opportunity to its citizens to do something spectacular with your life.

Notably, if you want to explore the dangerous rise of the “military-industrial complex” in the United States and the ensuring expansion of American imperialism abroad, watch the documentary “Why We Fight.”

However, despite it’s many weaknesses, America offers its citizens many strengths, the strongest of which is the opportunity for individual achievement that benefits the greater good.

Consider for a moment the seemingly insurmountable odds America faced when it declared its independence from England.  On paper the odds of our success were minuscule – but only because those odds discounted the resourcefulness of the colonists driven to dream and motivated to make a difference.

Even a brief look at American history reveals that there were uncountable, some would say insurmountable challenges faced by the colonists. Yet, they embraced the philosophy that would later be defined by Jim Collins as the Stockdale Paradox: “retain faith that you will prevail in the end, regardless of the difficulties – and at the same time – confront the most brutal facts of your current reality, whatever they may be.”

Fortune Cookie: Discover the Power within YourselfCertainly, there are real limitations that we all face, but I encourage you to look beyond your limitations to what is, rather than what is not.

As I previously noted, the past two years have been both challenging but rewarding to me on personal and professional levels. At some point during my recent journey I received a fortune cookie (pictured above) from Panda Express that reads: “Discover the Power Within Yourself.”

As trite as this message may sound and as much as I realize these “fortunes” are mass-produced, something always felt as if this message was meant to inspire and invigorate me.

For what it’s worth, it has worked — though I also credit the devotion of my Dad and Stepmom who have also been a source of selfless support. For their love, and the words of my “fortune” I remain grateful and, most of all, hopeful.

And, so in closing, whether you are celebrating your country’s 235th birthday or commemorating another personally poignant passage in your life, I encourage you to declare your independence from indifference and discover the power within yourself to pursue your passion and achieve your dreams!

h1

Is Creativity without Contribution a Waste?

April 23, 2009

Last week, after posting my last blog entry about Sir Ken Robinson’s riveting 2006 TED speech, I added a link to it from my LinkedIn profile status update, asking the question “Do schools kill creativity? Yes, says Sir Ken Robinson in his 2006 TED Talk!”

I didn’t think much of my decision to do so as I’ve been using my LinkedIn profile and my Facebook account to cross-promote my blog entries for quite some time. Additionally my most recent blog posts also display on my LinkedIn profile (as will this one). I typically receive a few comments on Facebook, but very few, if any, on LinkedIn.

This would be the case no longer.

Looking In from the Outside -- From 365 Days: 4/365 (December 4, 2008)After one positive comment from a colleague within my LinkedIn network, I soon found myself engaged in an unexpected, yet interesting electronic exchange about creativity versus innovation with another colleague.

His essential argument was creativity which does not result in a tangible good or service for which people will pay money is wasteful and void of value.

Further, he added society does not pay for the creative process, but the result of that process.

My counterargument was creativity is the foundation of innovation, that ideation without implementation is another word for brainstorming: an essential, though admittedly inefficient process.

What’s more, I argued the possibility of commoditization should not be the only indicator of value: a society worth living in should value ideas and reward creative thought. Notably, I found myself heretically disagreeing with management guru Peter F. Drucker’s canonical thoughts on the matter.

I’ve included a transcript of the exchange below, but I removed the name of the person with whom I had the conversation out of respect for his privacy (however, if you are in my LinkedIn network I presume it is something to which you have access):

Colleague: Sir Ken is great, but people aren’t paid to be Creative. Innovative, perhaps. The latter is operational; it includes implementation skills.

Me: Certainly the best ideas should be actionable. But can you have innovation w/o creativity?

Me: In a recent interview Guy Kawasaki talked about “ideas vs. action” as related to luck. I blogged about it: http://bit.ly/GoLuckYourself

Colleague: That’s my point. The obverse, that you can have creativity w/o innovation/implementation, is the concern.

Me: A valid concern, but re: ROI/measurement could it be argued that creativity indirectly leads to innovation by stimulating thinking?

Me: I suppose you don’t want to encourage aimlessness or hinder potential (w/ a BA in English and an MBA I see both sides).

Colleague: Everybody loves creative kids, but generally creative adults are misfits. Read Peter F. Drucker on “The Fallacy of Creativity.”

Me: But it is usually the misfits who make the biggest mark and through their rejection of assimilation render real innovation.

Me: Drucker says “creativity is no substitute for analysis and knowledge,” but I counter that creativity combines analysis and knowledge.

Colleague: Society doesn’t pay for (creative) process, it pays for contribution, for results. Process w/o results=waste.

Colleague: Matthew, I’m outta here! Have to create some clients!

Me: A society worth living in values ideas and rewards creative thought. Not everything can be commoditized.

Me: Process w/o results=brainstorming (which eventually leads to an idea that can be implemented).

Me: Thanks for the engaging discourse!

I appreciated this unique opportunity to engage in a spirited debate on LinkedIn. Ironically, one day earlier, I had espoused on Twitter that I often find myself unsure how to leverage LinkedIn because it seems to be the most formal and least interactive of all social media platforms I use.

How perfectly timed was this exchange to disprove my earlier assumption?! Coincidentally, I’ve been making efforts to participate more in the groups to which I belong and to add comments to the status updates of my colleagues.

In reviewing the exchange above, I realize there are some similarities between my colleagues thoughts and those communicated by Guy Kawasaki in my earlier blog post to which I referred my colleague. Specifically consider this passage:

“At the beginning of my career I used to think that the idea is the key, and once you get a good idea, implementation is easy. Now, I’m at the end of my career and I believe the exactly the opposite: I think good ideas are easy and implementation is hard.”

From that perspective I see my colleagues point: you can have all the ideas in the world, but until you do something with them or about them do those ideas really matter? In other words, you can think about doing something all day long, but until you actually do it, have you achieved your goal?

Yet, I also question how you can contribute without having invested time into the creative process? And, any reasonably person accepts that the creative process is, by nature and almost by requirement, inefficient and irregular.

Perhaps this is a chicken and egg scenario? Or, strangely, does it somehow connect to the age old existentialist question of “if a tree falls in a forest and nobody is there to hear it, does it make a sound?”

What do you think: is creativity without contribution a waste?

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,736 other followers