online book Against Fairness – doctorio.us

Vote
Exclusive oves because they will introduce oyalty partiality bias and favoritism To ove everyone we cannot preferentially The Library of the Unwritten (Hells Library love any individual or group Orwell however believed thatove means nothing if it does not mean oving some people than othersThe focus on euality of outcome may produce a generation burdened with an indignant sense of entitlement 80% of euality of outcome may produce a generation burdened with an indignant sense of entitlement 80% of may be showing up but then you ve got to perform noBy benefiting relatives altruistic acts preserve the altruist s genes even if he may not be the one to perpetuate themNature is not a war of all against all but RATHER A WAR OF US AGAINST a war of us against with fierce intra tribe oyaltyIt s interesting to note how uickly a strict egalitarian notion of eual opportunity starts to break down when competence is introduced as a criterionIt s not ogic or calculation that explains a friendship but historyBiology can bind people together but so can shared experiences emotions values and habits And that uniue contingent history prevents any transferability of friendship You can t have substitute friendsVice in abundance is easy to get the road is smooth and begins beside you but the gods have put sweat between us and virtueLearning to curb selfishness is not the same as fairness Greed is countered by generosity but one can be unfairly generous directing all of one s giving to a favoured fewGroup favoritism does not automatically entail negative judgments towards out groups unless there is a forced dichotomyHigh minded notions retributive justice fairness have roots in ower emotions revenge envyPublic morality shame based VS private morality guilt basedWhat is owed to one have roots in Mud and Stars lower emotions revenge envyPublic morality shame based VS private morality guilt basedWhat is owed to one is respect not eual affections or treatment One only has finite time and attention to go aroundDeveloping countries have a form of favoritism philanthropy focused charity effortsPolitical empowerment movements are effective because a tribes gets powerful enough such that they can noonger be ignored not by the implementation of some abstract egalitarian principleAffirmative action badly executed means that preferred groups don t have to work hard and non preferred groups have no reward when they doPride can prevent you from graciously accepting help and can fill you with resentment instead of appreciation It takes real effort and sensitivity to accept preferential treatmentThe intimacy of favoritism brings personal character back to the forefront of ethics where it belongs Caught not taughtOne can t ove humanity one can only ove people Graham GreeneLove not fairness is the engine of philanthropyThe digital world adds breadth not depth to human connections the exception being when you already have some depth with a friend in the real world and can enhance it in the digital realm. Tzsche he reveals how we have confused fairness with noble traits ike compassion and open mindedness He dismantles a number of seemingly egalitarian pursuits from class wide Valentine’s Day cards to civil rights to reveal the envy that ies at their hearts going on to prove that we can still be kind to strangers have no prejudice and fight for eual opportunity at the same time we reserve the best of what we can offer for those dearest to us               Fed up with the blue ribbons for all absurdity of “fairness” today and wary of the psychological paralysis it creates Asma resets our moral compass with favoritism as its odestar providing a strikingly new and remarkably positive way to think through all our actions big and small?. ,

By Libertarians and many Conservatives is that people are eual before the aw but otherwise they remain in competition with each other Stephen Asma identifies himself This book is a bit of a counterpoint to another one I previously read Against Empathy The Case for Rational Compassion they weren t written for that purpose but that s how it worked out in The Case for Rational Compassion they weren t written for that purpose but that s how it worked out in reading Now I thought this book would intone against the sort of fairness demanded by a fourth grade teacher in some government eft wing brain washing operation aka public school insisting that all outcomes must be eual or some bureaucrat who somehow things affirmative action is fair now that s a book I could get behind But Asma s book could just I iked it an interesting read And I ve heard an interview with him Favoritism is in us I suppose we ought not to deny it but balance it with societal needs And I agree with him that we need to be specific with the word fairness it really does get used as a blanket term when we actually mean other things A bit boring and many references to bible and Greek stories A good poke at the overly exalted position of the concept of fairness along with a defense of favoritism Very thought provoking A great challenge to many of my assumptions Read this after reading an Asma essay in the NYT blog While I hated some parts of this book I can t make too scathing a statement because I have to begrudgingly admit it s not wholly awful I still feel that it s flawed howeverAn example of this tension is the treatment of racism and sexism It s unmentioned for most of the book but then a ate section does address it So it s not an awful blindspot as I thought early on but that doesn t mean I accept the arguments given I feel the justifications as to why the author isn t arguing favor of racism and sexism are inadeuate and consider only the easiest potential problemsThe author is prone to a particular type of strawman where he frames all opposing positions at their most utopian addresses thoughtless implementations of them and insists that all opponents have zero sense of compromise or ambiguity on complex moral issuesMost annoying is a tendency to describe an opposing viewpoint often with actual research and then simply state I don t agree and I think most people don t either There s an undercurrent that the author believes most people wholly agree with him and that this unproven fact should influence us against opposing argumentsThere are some decent parts of the book where it talks about cultural or scientific facts But once you remove the descriptions and anecdotes not much of this book is actually arguments designed to convince someone who might disagree with the author Gandhi is actually arguments designed to convince someone who might disagree with the author Gandhi that the seeker of good have no. Showed our unfair tendencies a Personality Selling little kindness indeed if we favored favoritism                Conscious of the egalitarian feathers his argument is sure to ruffle Asma makes his point by synthesizing a startling array of scientific findings historical philosophies cultural practices analytic arguments and a variety of personal anditerary narratives to give a remarkably nuanced and thorough understanding of how fairness and favoritism fit within our moral architecture Examining everything from the survival enhancing biochemistry that makes our mothers ove us to the motivating properties of our “affective community” he not only shows how we favor but the reasons we should Drawing on thinkers from Confucius to Tocueville to Nie. .

Review Against Fairness

.
Please give my review a helpful vote Fairness by Stephen T AsmaThis is a short book that argues in favor of nepotism Author Stephen T Asma constructs a contrarian against what he calls the great grid of impartiality He a While there were some interesting moments I found this title to be ultimately disappointing Perhaps I wax curmudgeonly here because I expected something different those expectations being set by the titleIn defining fairness As Eual Outcomes The eual outcomes the posits himself as really going out on a Black Mountain (Isaiah Coleridge limb by being against the forced distribution of eual outcomes Hence the title and the somewhat over stated cover photo Maybe at Columbia this is going out on aimb but not so much in the broader meeting place of ideasAside from the very informative and interesting though short section on the bio chemical basis for favoritism I found the remaining material and analysis to be a mixed bag In specific Asma takes a variety of international cross cultural trips to show where favoritism and tribalism are beneficial finally Napoleons Military Machine Operations Manual landing in the US to then support the motivations of almost every confiscation program since LBJ He states he is against fairness but seemingly has no problem with taking and using other people s assets in order to address the perceived issues ofess successful parties for whatever they feel they are owed and for whatever reasons they feel they are owed BummerBecause of this contradiction I found myself about 60% in and unable to articulate his basic point a point that had seemed clear in the first 30% of the book Whenever that has happened in the past I ve held myself accountable and gone back to piece things together In this case alone I actually held the writer accountable His sub points did not harmonize with one another nor did they add up to a directed wholeIn the end I could not figure out who the audience was supposed to be nor the central message to that audience Excellent book Wow Who could be against fairnessWell Stephen Asma the author of Against Fairness is He claims that Fairness has become muddled with a sense of effusive empathy so that Eual OUTCOMES has often become the goal of public policy School kids these days have to send a valentine to every other kid in the class Everybody gets a cupcake Everybody wins a prize for running the race Nobody s feelings get hurt The author doesn t ike this trend He argues that this confused sense of Fairness has distorted POLICIES SUCH AS AFFIRMATIVE ACTION BUT such as Affirmative Action But goes further He says Nepotism which often congers up the idea of corruption is actually behavior than benefits your group or tribe and that nepotism is a fundamental part of human social behavior than even reciprocityThe basic agument against absolute euality made. From the school yard to the workplace there’s no charge damning than “You’re being unfair” Born out of democracy and raised in our open markets fairness has become our de facto modern creed The very symbol of American ethics Lady Justice wears a blindfold as she weighs the aw on her impartial scale In our zealous pursuit of fairness we have banished our urges to Colorist's Special Effects 2: Step-by-step coloring guides. Improve your skills! like one person than another one thing over another hiding them away as dirty secrets of our humanity  In Against Fairness polymath philosopher Stephen T Asma drags them triumphantly back into theight Through playful witty but always serious arguments and examples he vindicates our unspoken and undeniable instinct to favor making the case that we would all be better off if we. .
Against Fairness


10 thoughts on “online book Against Fairness – doctorio.us

  1. says: online book Against Fairness – doctorio.us

    Review Against Fairness online book Against Fairness – doctorio.us Wow Who could be against fairness?Well Stephen Asma the author of Against Fairness is He claims that Fairness has become muddled with a sense of effusive empathy so that Eual OUTCOMES has often become the goal of public policy School kids these days have to send a valentine to every other kid in the class Everybody gets a cupcake Everybody wins a prize for running the race Nobody's feelings get hurt The author doesn't like this trend He

  2. says: online book Against Fairness – doctorio.us Review Ó eBook, ePUB or Kindle PDF Ó Stephen T. Asma

    online book Against Fairness – doctorio.us Review Ó eBook, ePUB or Kindle PDF Ó Stephen T. Asma Review Against Fairness Please give my review a helpful vote Fairness by Stephen T AsmaThis is a short book that argues in favor of nepoti

  3. says: Review Ó eBook, ePUB or Kindle PDF Ó Stephen T. Asma Stephen T. Asma Ó 8 Characters online book Against Fairness – doctorio.us

    Review Against Fairness Stephen T. Asma Ó 8 Characters online book Against Fairness – doctorio.us A good poke at the overly exalted position of the concept of fairness along with a defense of favoritism Very thought provoking A great challenge to many of my assumptions Read this after reading an Asma essay in the NYT blog

  4. says: Stephen T. Asma Ó 8 Characters Review Ó eBook, ePUB or Kindle PDF Ó Stephen T. Asma online book Against Fairness – doctorio.us

    online book Against Fairness – doctorio.us This book is a bit of a counterpoint to another one I previously read Against Empathy The Case for Rational Com

  5. says: online book Against Fairness – doctorio.us Stephen T. Asma Ó 8 Characters

    online book Against Fairness – doctorio.us While there were some interesting moments I found this title to be ultimately disappointing Perhaps I wax curmudgeonly here because I expected something different those expectations being set by the titleIn defining fairn

  6. says: Stephen T. Asma Ó 8 Characters Review Ó eBook, ePUB or Kindle PDF Ó Stephen T. Asma online book Against Fairness – doctorio.us

    online book Against Fairness – doctorio.us Stephen T. Asma Ó 8 Characters Review Ó eBook, ePUB or Kindle PDF Ó Stephen T. Asma While I hated some parts of this book I can't make too scathing a statement because I have to begrudgingly admit it's not w

  7. says: online book Against Fairness – doctorio.us

    online book Against Fairness – doctorio.us Review Ó eBook, ePUB or Kindle PDF Ó Stephen T. Asma I liked it an interesting read And I've heard an interview with him Favoritism is in us I suppose we ought not to deny it but balance it with societal needs And I agree with him that we need to be specific with the word 'fairness' it really does get used as a blanket term when we actually mean other things

  8. says: online book Against Fairness – doctorio.us Stephen T. Asma Ó 8 Characters Review Ó eBook, ePUB or Kindle PDF Ó Stephen T. Asma

    online book Against Fairness – doctorio.us Review Ó eBook, ePUB or Kindle PDF Ó Stephen T. Asma Stephen T. Asma Ó 8 Characters Excellent book

  9. says: online book Against Fairness – doctorio.us Review Ó eBook, ePUB or Kindle PDF Ó Stephen T. Asma

    online book Against Fairness – doctorio.us Stephen T. Asma Ó 8 Characters Review Against Fairness Gandhi recommended that the seeker of good have no exclusive loves because they will introduce loyalty partiality bias and favoritism To love everyone we cannot preferentially love any individual or group Orwell however believed that love means nothing if it does not mean loving some people than othersThe focus on euality of outcome

  10. says: online book Against Fairness – doctorio.us Review Ó eBook, ePUB or Kindle PDF Ó Stephen T. Asma Stephen T. Asma Ó 8 Characters

    Stephen T. Asma Ó 8 Characters online book Against Fairness – doctorio.us A bit boring and many references to bible and Greek stories

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *