PDF BOOKS Winners Take All AUTHOR Anand Giridharadas – doctorio.us
This is an excellent book and a must read It s also totally readable and even uite funny at times And it s the kind of book that you keep bringing up in conversation and then trailing off and saying you just really have to read this book The oversimplified thesis is that you can t use the master s tools to break down his house I hope this book is widely read and circulated Winners Take All is the hardest book I have ever read Not because it was inaccessible or esoteric but because it forced a long overdue look in the mirror Being in the tech industry I ve been swept up in thought leadership heroic hilanthropy and the The Elders Speak promise of innovation to impact lives at scale For a moment I was becoming convinced that maybe the marketlace was in fact the best The Pharisees Guide to Total Holiness place to solve our social ills Maybe the right combination ofhilanthropies and technology could fix most of our biggest issues With each Thirteenth Child (Frontier Magic, page I slowly realized the lie I was telling myself to justify my newfoundrivilege in society I saw myself in the story of Hilary Cohen a young idealistic college grad swept by corporate furor over a desire to change the world and make impact at scale through the marketplace I rationalized momentarily selling out with the Craft Notes for Animators promise of building skills so one day I may be better suited to truly make the impact I desired in theublic sector I could have my cake and eat it tooI saw myself in the story of Darren Walker the Perception and the External World philanthropist who against all odds went fromoverty to riches We share the same central uestions How do you reconcile the incompatible identity transition from a Popular Representations of Development poor upbringing to another of riches and opportunity How do you navigate the new elite social circles life throws you in Am I too comfortable in my newfoundrivilegeHow do you respond to the uncomfortable cooing and admiration Look at Cesar Why can t they all be like him He had a single mother He ut himself through school Even the most well meaning do not understand the selfish ways we contribute to a society where we increasingly make stories like mine and Darren s impossible to continue to emerge The largest or most freuent donors to charity won t change the fact that for my story to emerge again the stars would need to align yet again but in a unlikely way When you join the club of winners in society and you champion causes Before you read this book read the author s bio For someone who is so critical of elites hiding in their hobbit holes he waits until the acknowledgments section at the end to let you know that he is one of them I found this incredibly bizarre He says the reason is because he didn t want to make the book about him but at the same time he states The best way to know about a roblem is to be a The Blue Door (Threshold part of it I think theremise of the work would have been infinitely Two Views on the Doctrine of the Trinity powerful had he started by being transparent with his insider outerspective He has no The Art of Standing Still problems criticizing Bill Clinton later in the book for not understandingeople s lack of trust with elites yet how does he expect to gain that trust himself from readers by not owning his own A Ladys Honor (Cliffs of Cornwall, privilege from the onsetHe states theurpose of his book is among other things a debate with my friends It is a letter written with love and concern to Bob and Larry in the Case of the Missing Patience people whom I see yielding to a new Faith many of whom I know to be decent This makes him sound like Darren Walker one of the examples of the do gooders by doing well he gives in his analysis Walker is an African American who managed to climb the social ladder and now collaborates with MarketWorld and its elites in an effort to createositive change He does this by catering to their sensibilities balancing his own ideals of social justice which reuire acknowledgment of the elite s complicity in the global The War to End All Wars problem of ineuality with the gentler language of opportunity and win wins for all which soothe the rich man s conscience and his entrepreneurial interestsGiridharadas spends his book criticizing Darren Walker Amy Cuddy and others for trying to catch flies with honey than vinegar but then thought he would be effective by writing them a book He does this knowing that that one of the elites he writes about Simon Sinek doesn t even read but rather has othereople read for him To be fair Sinek has a learning disability but still Know your audience dude I really started to lose my Death Comes for the Archbishop patience when a uote from Audre Lorde got juxtaositioned next to a uote from Donald Trump at the beginning of chapter 5 That s just blasphemy The chapter is titled Arsonists make the best firefighters and focuses on Sean Hinton a former adviser to Goldman Sachs and Rio Tinto who long ago studied love songs in Mongolia Hinton seems to sense some of the cognitive dissonance between his Mostly Mama participation in the system and his internal criticism of it Ultimately though he believes his values areersonal and separate from the job he is hired to do End chapter So arsonists don t make the best fire fighters Therefore you don t make the best fire fighter Mr Writer Then I got to chapter 7 and was met with BillHillary conflation and Bernie roselytizing and criticism of globalists a term that I only hear used creepy faralt right Nazi circles on the Internet to explain their conspiracy theories about on the left It s not that there isn t legitimate criticism in this chapter of the olitical left s failing to advocate for government s role and instead Damias Children pandering to capitalisthilanthropists and corporate sponsors That s totally valid But the author spends almost 50 Cutremur de timp pages taking folks like Bill Clinton to town for his complicity Meanwhile George Bush gets called out once maybe twice the whole book for dick things his administration did like enabling the Sackler s Oxycotin induced opium epidemic and Donald Trump actually gets credit for understanding the anger the masses feel toward elites What is the reasoning here Try and get the richeople who aren t just flat out malicious and evil to see how they are also Backlash : La guerre froide contre les femmes problematic Is this book like A Christmas Carol meant to serve as the ghosts of Past Present and Future for the Ebenezer Scrooges of the world to beersuaded by it In addition to who is this book for exactly one of my other major complaints is how the elite becomes interchangeable with MarketWorld a term encapsulating a blurry entity of rich Die Botin des Königs (Reiter-Trilogie people who mean well but are too afraid to confront the realroblem of ineuality and their involvement in it *There s really no distinguishing between them other than they re all rich and they are okay * s really no distinguishing between them other than they re all rich and they are okay who care at least to some extent The Patagonia Express political divide between them left or right isn t ever really explored and eventually becomes irrelevant To me THAT is a gross oversight Because yes George Soros and Bill Clinton may be misguided in their good intentions but what about the Koch Bros You compare the elite on the left vs the elite on the right you have folks that at least feel a little bit guilty that there s ineuality vs folks who are beyond the comical caricature of Mr Burns and totally okay withouring their money into the new Nazi world order Some winners are worse than others okay And some winners have money than others A lot of the big BIG winners are old white dudes on the right sincerely invested in harming everyday Predator people not Oprah That needs to be acknowledged Giridharadas fails to do that Honestly when Iicked up this book I thought I would sail through it like a ship on a breezy day over a sea of opulist rage Instead it was grueling slogging read one in which i learned way about just in which I learned way about just oblivious and ignorant the upper class really is than I ever wanted or needed to know I also learned just how obstinately committed this same elite group is in refusing to acknowledge their complicity andor using the ower they have co opted to make the changes necessary to redistribute wealth for the betterment of society The I read the hopeless I felt for the futureIf this guy can t convince his own buddies at McKinsey and the Aspen Institute to listen to him then what is the Seven Days in Utopia point of his book According to Giridharadas it is also a letter to theublic urging them to reclaim world changing from those who have co opted it Oh so now it s on everyone else again to fix things CoolTo his credit in the last chapter Giridharadas brings in Chiara Cordelli a scholar in Lots of Love political science who has a solution that MarketWorlders return against their instincts and evenerhaps against their interests to Reclaiming Love politics as thelace we go to shape the world Going back to Vegangelical politics means restoring theower of Defender of Faith, Revised Edition political institutions such as laws courts taxes rights etcThe real uestion then is How do we do that restoringower to our No escuches su canción de trueno political institutions our democracy when the elite have invested so much money into undermining thoseolitical institutions Especially now that we are seriously on the brink of the collapse of western democracy Is the damage too far done Giridharadas is right that the wealthy need to stop looking at themselves as the saviors of the world and acknowledge their hand in the Being the Best Me problem But counting on everydayeople to read his book and re claim world changing is so vague and unhelpful People are already doing that Consider the Women s March Black Lives Matter March for Our Lives Families Belong Together These weren t Witch Creek (Wildlands protests led byaid George Soros lackeys These were real angry Sleight (AVRA-K people in the Americanublic rallying and crying out against horrible injustices They were exercising their right to free speech and to assembly They were grasping onto the last vestiges of democratic Slave Labor Graphics Titles power they had as non billionaires It s Cordelli theolitical scientist Giridharadas cites who ultimately offers the most romising solution She suggests that elites are going to have to be the ones to stop making foundations or charities to name after themselves and seriously re invest their undeserved wealth into ublic institutions climb down the social ladder rejoin the ranks of the majority of The Creative Writing Handbook people in society so that the rest of us can start having a say for ourselves again Giridharadas seems to agree with that otherwise he wouldn t have saved her for last and uoted her so thoroughly but that means his expose is really just a depressing detailed depiction about how greedy and willfully ignorant richeople are I already knew that dude Sometimes the best way to know about a Water Death (Outbound, problem isn t to be aart of it but rather to be a victim of it Then the Between the Savior and the Sea problemersists because the erpetrators aren t listening to the victims So I say to Giridharadas since you re in the club sounds like you need to have some tougher conversations with your friends to get them to start listening otherwise the world is going to be facing uglier alternatives to the one Cordelli is roposing Very mixed feelings about this book I liked some Written in the Stars (Cricket Creek, parts too much to give a low rating disliked otherarts too much to give a high rating and don t feel those should average outWhile I was reading I was considering a criticism that this book is ultimately not engaged in critical thought but is just another thought leader simply for a different demographic But it doesn t entirely fall into this trap and it isn t shallow or vapid There are definitely The Great Anarchists pieces that were solidYet I still feel like this book sroject is fundamentally flawed I don t think someone who started out disbelieving in the book s Modern Engineering Statistics premise would be convinced nor does the book seem to even attempt to convince them agreement with central tenets isresumed As someone favorably inclined toward the remise I was hoping for a rigorous analysis of the issue that would deepen my understanding of the subject I didn t get that as much as I d likeFor example the criticism of the family that made their wealth via OxyContin was exactly along the lines I wanted Direct empirical analysis of their impacts on both sides which in my mind is a serious criticism of their hilanthropic efforts that unde. An insider's groundbreaking investigation of how the global elite's efforts to change the world The Silver Nightingale preserve the status uo and obscure their role in causing theroblems they later seek to solveFormer New York Times columnist Anand Giridharadas takes us into the inner sanctums of a new gilded age where the rich and Threshold powerful fight for euality and justice any way they can except ways that threaten the social order and theirosition atop it We Rmines all their rhetoric I d have referred a whole chapter devoted to it but I enjoyed that segmentBut many other segments don t engage on that level For example criticizing business executives who reduce Indian economics to a market chain seems Sweep of the Blade (Innkeeper Chronicles, promising but there s no analysis just throwing out hypotheticals that might undermine theirosition Those are uestions with real answers that would be a far stronger response so why bring them up without getting into the facts of the situationNow a book doesn t need to be empirical analysis there s a Not for Nothing place for simply expressing ideas For example I was fascinated by the section about early objections to Carnegie shilanthropy But as much as some Eagles Claw parts were interesting I feel like a book with an aggressive thesis needs toresent a high degree of either novelty or rigor and this book didn t go all the way with eitherI d be favorable inclined toward its attempt if not for my last Superman/Doomsday problem with the book the tendency to smugly contradict interviewees in the text itself instead of raising those objections to their face and recording their response This is another book recommended to me by Richard In many ways this is a similar anderhaps an even better book than Small Change Why business won t save the world by Michael Edwards Under my review of that book Jan Maat mentions Andrew Carnegie and he gets uite a run in this book although I wouldn t be able to say he comes out of that looking Summers Family Affair particularly good In fact he isresented as Jan Maat says as the classic case of what hilanthropists are like Their oint is to not Women on the Hill pay their workers too much given workers will only likely spend it on wine women and song so it is much better to keep most of the money for yourself and then distribute itroperly and rationally according to a rational Waiting for Aphrodite plan involving various tributes named after yourself In the interests of full disclosure I have to admit that I m notarticularly fond of the third economy or Pirateship Down (Sentinels of New Orleans philanthropy generally and I would ban charities and replace them with government run welfare funded by higher rates of taxation I ve never had too much trouble understanding thereferences of my fellow Irishman Oscar Wilde around the nature of charity He made it abundantly clear that charity is an evil than a virtue despite the King James Bible s And though I have the gift of The Sand-Reckoner prophecy and understand all mysteries and all knowledge and though I have all faith so that I could remove mountains and have not charity I am nothing As Wilde says Charity they those in receipt of it feel to be a ridiculously inadeuate mode ofartial restitution or a sentimental dole usually accompanied by some impertinent attempt on the Aztlan part of the sentimentalist to tyrannise over theirrivate lives As you see nothing ever changes charity still remains a gift and is distributed according to the morality of those giving It is soul crushing and debasing of our common humanity for both the giver and receiverEdwards book is good since it focuses on the uestion of the extent to which the skills of business eople match those necessary to address social roblems such as urban Paris Encore (Zion Covenant, poverty the achievement gap in schools drug addiction and so on Given that these are mostly social issues reuiring community solutions and thehilanthropists are mostly skilled in Boyfriends from Hell providing market solutions to allroblems there is a clear disconnectThis book is better because while Edwards does note that those able to act as Battered Not Broken philanthropists are also those who have made their fortunes benefiting from a system that haslayed no small What Ive Become (The Humanity Within Book 1) part in the creation and existence of socialroblems in the first The Contemporaries place this book goes further in making the extent of this clear So that the employmentractices of the companies such UML Weekend Crash Course [With CDROM] philanthropists make their money in that slash wages eliminate benefits and increase therecarity of employment are highlighted as causal to many of the Steampunk Erotica problems these charities then seek to fix The uestion is raised as to whether or not charities do harm than good it is too easy to think well charities might not beerfect but they are better than nothing at all and anyway isn t it better that the rich do something for the Poker Slave poor It isn t at all clear thathilanthropists do good than harm In fact to the extent that charities are used to cover the built in failings of the system and are run by eople who depend on how the system is currently set up for their wealth that is eople least likely to want to change those aspects of the system all that such charity is likely to achieve is to sate the consciences of those who will otherwise fight tooth and nail to Indulge (Warm Delicacy, perpetuate the injustices of the current world All of this is extensively documented hereSince the end of the 1970s we have seen a shift away from a welfare state where theoor had rights to assistance rather than being forced to become mendicants for crumbs and where social ineuality was not at its astronomical levels we are witnessing today The market has been Tabloid City presented as the sole solution to allroblems and this has exacerbated the Kirkland Revels problems rather than fixed them The uestion raised here is where is this all likely to end The movement towards greater ineuality with higher levels ofrecarity for ever larger sections of the To Him Who Sits on the Throne population seem increasingly inevitable given the free marketolicies ursued by both sides of olitics in the US and across the West A large Youth, Beautiful Youth part of the end of this book focuses on Bill Clinton s efforts to open and of the US economy to market forces both asresident and through his institute after leaving ower this attitude is certainly not limited to the US However the election of Trump and the move towards authoritarian leaders internationally seems to be a conseuence of this the market is the answer belief system This book is an interesting read it follows a number of eople who want to do good but are convinced as is the universal Fault Lines prejudice of our age that if you are to learn how to do good you must learn your skills in a global accounting firm because being able to apply the logic andractices of such firms is Hunt for 901 presented as the onlyath to addressing all issues This is also the logic of organisations such as the Teach for movement Again too often market solutions leave no room for community solutions that is these market solutions are imposed on communities rather than with them As such they are all too rarely successfulI would recommend this book I feel a storm is coming To uote another Irishman And I say to my Chasing After Infinity people s masters Beware Beware of the thing that is coming beware of the riseneopleWho shall take what ye would not give Did ye think to conuer the Morir por un iPhone - Apple, Foxconn y las luchas de los trabajadores en China people or that law is stronger than life And than men s desire to be free We will try it out with you ye that have harried and held Ye that have bullied and bribed Tyrants hypocrites liars From The Rebel Patrick Pearse I really enjoyed this but it might be just because fundamentally I m ideologically opposed toeople being that wealthy I think it does a really good job of what the intended Captain China Volume 1 purpose is to show that a lot of timeshilanthropy itself is just a way to ameliorate Interplay: The Process of Interpersonal Communication problems caused by the sameeople doing the Cast On, Bets Off philanthropy and that much of thehilanthropy can not make up for the systemic issues we have created by letting eople accumulate as much wealth at the expense of others as we do I think its fair to express the desire to read other books that go through it much numericallyor in a data oriented way to show a larger trend but I think that wasn t the urpose of the book so it didn t bother me as much as some of the Past Lives, Future Lives people who didn t like the book I do think it can be repetitious and just hits on one theme over and over again through a lot of interviewsanecdotes so avoid this if that s not what you re looking for I do think it s important though forointing out the hypocrisy inherent in a lot of the giving back rich Love with Every Beat people do I also don t see why the author should have torovide solutions because I do think it s a hard complex roblem Like I think there is a PLACE FOR BOOKS THAT JUST POINT for books that just oint and describe a If Walls Could Talk (Haunted Home Renovation Mystery, problem that exists it doesn t have to berescriptive Anyways ersonally I really enjoyed it but I have my own biases and ideology so take what I say with a grain of salt What Trump and Idealists Have in Common Making a difference could be the idealistic theme of my generation s collective ethos at least among those of us who survived the drug culture of the 60 s and 70 s with intact minds It is my generation s term for religious faith The world had been opened to us by cheap access to good education a long ost war economic boom a range of radical new به سوی زبان شناسی شعر philosophies and or less guaranteed employment Belief in oneself in society in theerfectability of life was the route to success and fulfillmentWe had choices And the right Genesis people appeared to be demonstrating how to exerciseower around the world environmental improvement Jane Goodall human rights Martin Luther King the status of women Betty Friedan the Church Pope John XXIII This was concretely Mirror Matter personal not abstractly intellectual inspiration Anything wasossible for individuals with the courage *to A Kiss of Shadows (Merry Gentry put themselves on the line or at least for those with the determination to get others tout * put themselves on the line or at least for those with the determination to get others to Six Days put on the line they had laid outSo we had an obvious moral duty to improve the world Ourarents worked at corporate jobs in order to earn a living Not us We had corporate careers in order to make the world a better Awareness place Ours was an enlightened self interest which took the old fashioned idea of vocation seriously Our lives had to mean something By which we meant we had to dedicate ourselves to a cause something beyond ourselves as the gurus of the timehrased it And that we did with diverse Cat Out of Hell passion in businessolitics and academiaFor example we simply Chicken Soup for the Soul at Work presumed we would always have enough to eat The uestion was how to make sure others did as well Hence theopularity of things like the Hunger Project which seriously aimed to eliminate global food deprivation entirely within 20 years and Monsanto s GM research The world remained corporate but it was no longer exploiting us now we were exploiting it for the betterment of humanity And by the way we made good money at it But we were adding value not just being avaricious self justifying social dronesSuch smug bastards have always existed but Mother India perhaps never before or after in such naive density which made our conceitsart of the air we breathed We could afford these conceits because we were buoyed up sustained and insured by a social and economic system that wanted us to act based The Late Romances precisely on the basis of this ideology of making a difference We were an elite the beneficiaries of a system we neither understood nor created But our conversations and associations were almost solely with other members of the elite who spoke the same language of vision and commitment and humanotential Making a difference became the late 20th century s Passion for Christ, Passion for Humanity post industrial version of the 19th century s technological Progress a sort of moral neo liberalism of the soulNot until decades later did the real conseuences of our visions and commitments andotentials show themselves a economically divided a less environmentally sustainable a intensely My Curvy Valentine (Perfect Fit, politically fragmented and militarily hostile world than we could have ever imagined Theoint of Anand Giridharadas s book is to understand the connection between these elites social concern and Attainment (Temptation, predation between the extraordinary helping and the extraordinary hoarding between the milking anderhaps abetting of an unjust status uo and the attempts by the milkers to repair a small Hatred in the belly part of it It is also an attempt to offer a view of how the elite see the world so that we might better assess the merits and limitations of their world changing campaigns Making a difference remains an abiding meme among today s cultural elite. Ee how they rebrand themselves as saviors of theoor; how they lavishly reward thought leaders who redefine change in winner friendly ways; and how they constantly seek to do good but never less harm We hear the limousine confessions of a celebrated foundation boss; witness an American Always Be Ready president hem and haw about hislutocratic benefactors; and attend a cruise ship conference where entrepreneurs celebrate their own self interested magnan. .
FREE DOWNLOAD æ DOCTORIO.US è Anand GiridharadasGiridharadas uotes a recent McKinsey Co recruiting brochure soliciting candidates who desire to Change the worldImprove livesInvent something newSolve a complex Encyclopedia of International Development problemExtend your talentsBuild enduring relationshipsThis is a laconic but still an accurate replica of theitch I received to join The Firm in 1976 It is also a Gender Inequality in Our Changing World paraphrase of similar documentsroduced by companies like Goldman Sachs and hundreds of others from Silicon Valley to Wall Street And it is in one form or another what every applicant to Harvard or Stanford or for that matter Oxford or Cambridge will be urged to consider If you are the best you ll want to be among the best is the bait that is hard to resist See and Making a difference is a subtle and destructive ideology a spiritual rather than social or economic ideology and therefore far convincing Giridharada through his Rooming in the Masters House personal case studies shows how and why Making a difference is an insidious ideology because it taps into the best human impulses empathy charity mercy It then uses these to justify the acuisition ofersonal Media, Home and Family powerolitical intellectual organisational Multicultural Partnerships power And since the first rule ofower is the necessity to maintain A Convent Tale power it not the virtues which motivated its acuisition is the essential ideological thread Feed the world becomes indistinguishable from Eliminateolitical resistance to the commercial bonanza of genetically modified crops Giridharada s kind of journalistic and academic melange is intriguing and Contemporary Issues in California Archaeology produces some eye opening observations about thearadoxes of Ethics for Police Translators and Interpreters power seeking especially among those with a social conscience He certainly establishes the credibility of his thesis that theowerful are fighting to change the world in ways that essentially keep it the same Nonetheless I find it lacking It doesn t get to the core of our arrogance about the world on our affect on it Our Immigration Nation presumption that good intentions backed by appropriate intellectual andractical skills will result in improved flourishing for humanity or the Vilfredo Pareto planet isn t just ill advised it is evilSometimes the extent of this evil can only be captured in religious terms Making a difference is at it turns out a rather ancient Christian heresy not just a mistake in judgment It s called Pelagianism the belief that it isossible to contribute to salvation of oneself or of the world unaided by something called grace Whatever grace is and where it comes from divine gift genetic legacy intellectual insight or even cosmic luck it can never be Incomplete Streets presumed upon Pelagius the eponymous monk whom Augustine targeted as arch heretic suffered neither from inadeuate intellectual vision nor lack ofassionate conviction His fatal flaw was a lack of humility a lack we don t normally associate today with grave sin And yet as Giridharadas notes we have such an obvious example in our midst that hubris is indeed evil Trump is the reductio ad absurdum of a culture that tasks elites with reforming the very systems that have made them and left others in the dust Making a difference is code for an ambition to The Fin-de-Siècle World power no matter who it comes from To make the distinction between the good my and bad his use ofower is nonsensical Power is itself corrupt as as well as corrupting just as Lord Acton suggested The human compulsion to God and the Multiverse power is the authentic Original Sin can t live with it can t do without it But recognising it for what it is when itops up among us is essential for healthy living Making a difference means I want to make a grab for English Warfare, 1511-1642 power when spoken by a youngerson By the time he or she has said it it s Trauma and Cognitive Science probably too late to do anything about it They re doomed Just as Augustine claimed it appears that Original Sin getsassed along in mother s milkPostscript I consider myself a social liberal But I have a sensitive nose when it comes to many apparently liberal causes because they not infreuently stink of After World Religions power grabbing This suspicion I share with the French conservative thinker Bertrand de Jouvenel who mistrusted all idealists as a matter of course See 30Jul20 on theersonal cost of idealistic ambition As someone who has dithered on the edges of elites changing the world much of this rings true and I believe and grapple with the tension between the sometimes necessary Hester powerinfluencefortune needed as we strive for justice and euity An article that I always refer back to is Noam Chomsky s dissection of justice vsower That and thoughts about how social movements and Resilient Health Care, Volume 3 protest no matter how ineffectual will always beowerful levers to create systemic change than social enterprises That s a whole other issue area though I wanted this book to be and found it was too long for what it had to say I believe governments too should be larger actors than businesses but the book drawing this conclusion seemed to be based on needing to The Sociology of Islam propose something else rather than a genuine endorsement I also would have hoped for greater analysis or critiue of this elite charade I d recommend all articles that are snippets of this book to everyone The book itself I drimarily recommend to Footnotes to a Lesson people who areart of these communities and have yet to realise everytime they use the word movement or activist it s an active form of co option An excellent expos of the wealthy and Legitimating Television powerful who aim to do good and justerpetuate systems of injustice Anand Giridharadas creates a compelling argument about how elites who work at corporations and companies like McKinsey and Goldman Sachs say they work for social change yet never address the core of what causes ineuality in the first Pink edition - Alternative Poetry Books place Herovides several detailed anecdotes of young adults who get swept up into these corporations based on the ideal that they will learn a skill set that will later help them do good or that through these firms they will work on Do you exist Mr Jones? projects that benefit all of society even when these firms often drive the marginalized further downward The book carries valuable implications ranging from how business will not solve society sressing GLYNSHADOW problems to why some disenfranchised folk distrusted Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election and A uote from the end of the book I liked a lot But that is a choice Cordelli tells us To do a modest bit of good while doing nothing about the larger system is to keep theainting You are chewing on the fruit of an injustice You may be working on a Mastering Aperture, Shutter Speed, ISO and Exposure prison educationrogram but you are choosing not to Bite Of Winter (Faes Captive, prioritize theursuit of wage and labor laws that would make Merry Christmas, Baby! people s lives stable anderhaps keep some of them out of jail You may be sponsoring a loan forgiveness initiative for law school students but you are choosing not to B-Sides and Remixes prioritize seeking a tax code that would take from you and cut their debts Your management consulting firm may be writing reports about unlocking trillions of dollars worth of women sotential but it is choosing not to advise its clients to stop lobbying against the social The Settlement of the German Coast of Louisiana and the Creoles of German Descent programs that have been shown in other societies to help women achieve the euality fantasized about in consultants reportsA limitation of the book includes that Giridharadas did not include theerspectives of the marginalized Massacre people heurports to care about It would have been helpful to read from the Troublemaker perspectives of those with lessrivilege to read what they think we should all do I wish Giridharadas focused on tangible actions toward the end of the book Instead of just Jésus en blue jeans pointing out theroblem with rich Anastasia people engaging inhilanthropy that maintains economic ineuality erhaps roviding steps to dismantle capitalism or work toward reparations would have made the book feel aligned with its stated mission I would still recommend it though as it has made me examine my own class rivilege and complicity in these systems of oppression Did you watch Zuckerberg testify before the Senate committees about Facebook and the 2018 election Were you struck by how blithely unrepentant he seemed how convinced that his titanic oorly monitored data base which he habitually describes as a community is an unalloyed benefit to us all Facebook was not originally created to be a company Zuckerberg claims It was built to accomplish a social mission to make the world open and connected So how is it that a billionaire like Zuckerberg can resume to appear so smugly virtuous Although a few reasons come immediately to my mind a oorly chosen defense strategy the habitual arrogance of wealth some Summers End personality or character defect I the truer explanation is universal It lies in thehilosophical attitude toward wealth and social change all the Silicon Valley billionaires which is shared in large The Sunlit Ambush part by the Wall StreetClinton Foundation crowd too Sucheople inhabit a distinct intellectual universe and an excellent way to learn about their world is to read Winners Take All the Elite Charade of Changing the World by Anand GiridhardasGiridhardas calls this universe MarketWorld and he encountered it up close and Promises for the Overcomer: 8 Essential Guarantees for Spiritual Victory personal when in 2011 he was chosen as a Henry Crown Fellow of the Aspen Institute an organization of leaders that seeks to deploy a new breed of leaders against the world s most intractableroblems It involved an inspiring series of one week seminars held in luxurious The Craven Trilogy places where he mingled with the ultra rich in decorated mansions Still something made Anand uneasy about the whole thing Even as I savored these luxuries and connections I found something amiss about the Aspen institute Here were all these rich andowerful Twisted people coming together and speaking about giving back and yet theeople who seemed to reap most of the benefits of this coming together were the helpers not the helped I began to wonder what was actually going on when the most fortunate don t merely seek to make a difference but also effectively claim ownership of changing the world I began to feel like a casual Harrys Mad participant in a giant sweet lipped lie Why were we coming to Aspen To change the system or to be changed by it To speak truth toower or to help make an unjust unpalatable system go down a little easily Could the intractable Pride problems weroposed to solve be solved in the way that we silently insisted at minimal most to elites with minimal distribution of ower Giridharadas continued to think about these matters and five years later at his Aspen Institute summer reunion he delivered a speech in which he summed up what he called the Aspen Consensus The winners of our age must be challenged to do which he summed up what he called the Aspen Consensus The winners of our age must be challenged to do But never ever tell them to do less harm This essentially is the hilosophy of MarketWorld We can all
Especially The Rich Dothe rich do by doing well Apply market solutions empower a few attempt to solve a few isolated social Rookie (Ross Records problems and guess what we can make ourselves even money and feel better about ourselves while we do it We ll work with governments sure but only if necessary for democracy is messy and difficult to control butlease don t speak to us about increasing corporate regulations or raising marginal tax rates or increasing estate taxes and while you re at it leave that deduction for the Black Panther purchase ofrivate jets alone tooGiridharadas attends and takes notes on many MarketWorld events conducts interviews with a few of the ultra rich and many of their minions an interview near the end of the book with Bill Clinton is Carnage (The Butcher, particularly illuminating and in addition he speaks with a number of aspiring entrepreneurs who adopt the MarketWorldhilosophy But he speaks with critics of MarketWorld too one of the most incisive being Chiara Cordelli Mo Urban Dictionary professor ofolitical Little Mermaid (Futanari Erotica Fairy Tales, philosophy at the university of Chicago She argues that one of the most dangerous things about the MarketWorld method is that it not only routinely marginalizes government institutions but also insists on benefits tax breaks elimination of regulations which damage and hamper its mechanisms and that as a result these institutions are becoming and ineffective And after all Cordelli says The government is us. ImityGiridharadas asks hard uestions Why for example should our gravestroblems be solved by the unelected upper crust instead of the Metaphysical Meditations public institutions it erodes by lobbying and dodging taxes He alsooints toward an answer Rather than rely on scraps from the winners we must take on the grueling democratic work of building robust egalitarian institutions and truly changing the world A call to action for elites and everyday citizens alik.